E1 Asset Management

Friday, April 18, 2008

How to cope with what’s going on in today’s market.

The market seems to have spiraled out of control these days. One day, recession fears cause the market to fall; the next day it’s inflation; banks and other financial institutions are posting massive losses; the Federal Reserve has had to find a way to bail out Bear Stearns, while at the same time home prices continue to fall, and foreclosures hit an all time high.

The Fed has been cutting interest rates to battle recession, at the same time oil continues to hit a new high causing gas prices to soar. On top of that, we are experiencing stagflation which has not happened since the 1970’s. So what are we supposed to do in times like this?

First of all, don’t panic! It’s natural to want to sell everything and walk away in times like this - some people have. This is causes a greater chance, of losing on your investments. If you take this route and you do decide to invest again, the market may go up to new highs and you miss out on all of the profits that could have been gained. Before you make any decisions, make sure you weigh out all of the pros and cons.

Next, don’t be afraid to open your account statement. There is a saying, “What you don’t know can’t hurt you”. This is the one time you do need to know at all times what is going on. This way you can make an informed decision on what to keep and what to change in your account. If you don’t pay attention with what’s going on with your investments, you could possibly suffer major losses.

Now that you know what is going on in your account, the next step is to ask yourself how much risk you are willing to take. Be sure to be honest with yourself, and to your advisor. Invest in a way that makes you feel comfortable. Just remember that a high risk does not necessarily mean a high reward or a better gain.

In the next coming months I believe the market will continue to have some wild swings. With the presidential elections around the corner, interest rates dropping, and home prices slipping, this may cause some uncertainty in the market. If you have any questions about your account, or what’s going on in the market, make sure you contact your advisor with any questions.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Farewell Chris Post !!!

Farewell Chris Post !!!

The main contributor to the E1 Blog, Christian Post, is no longer with E1.

We wish Chris best of luck in his new career.

We want to thank Chris for his efforts in building the blog and in maintaining it over the years. We will continue his initial work, so look out for updates.

Friday, December 21, 2007

Thank You

George Orwell once wrote that “Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.”

Today, we have troops stationed around the globe doing their part in a conflict unlike any this world has ever seen. Our enemies don’t wear uniforms, don’t observe rules of engagement and have probably never heard of the Geneva Convention.

We debate whether “water-boarding” an illegal combatant for 5 to 30 seconds is torture. Our enemies have no compunction drilling kneecaps, skinning people alive or beheading them on camera.

Think about that for a second. Really let it sink in. Understand the physical, emotional and mental stress of providing that umbrella of security we all take for granted. It is an unimaginable risk to many why someone would choose such a path—but to those who serve, their mission and purpose could not be clearer.

The point is, do not our troops or their service for granted. It is easy when the battle is half a world away to forget that the many sacrifices that are made are to protect us here. Especially now that the surge has produced quantifiable results (mainly a huge drop in casualties across the board) it’s not as “newsworthy” to our media and coverage has dwindled.

What I propose is simple:

If you see someone in uniform, say “thank you.” If you run into them at a bar, buy them a drink. It doesn’t matter if you are for or against the war, its called gratitude. Without the service of our brave men and women—this country would certainly cease to exist and our constitution would be nothing more than the dream of an idealist wandering around the city of brotherly love.

I quote Zell Miller’s speech from the RNC one more time:

Never in the history of the world has any soldier sacrificed more for the freedom and liberty of total strangers than the American soldier. And, our soldiers don't just give freedom abroad; they preserve it for us here at home.

For it has been said so truthfully that it is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us the freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech.

It is the soldier, not the agitator, who has given us the freedom to protest.

It is the soldier who salutes the flag, serves beneath the flag, whose coffin is draped by the flag, who gives that protester the freedom to abuse and burn that flag.

There are many organizations like “The Soldier’s Angels” and “Wounded Warrior Project” that are always looking for new volunteers, resources and whatever contributions can be made, no matter how small or insignificant it may seem.

Thank you and God Bless America.

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Merry Christmas Murdoch

The FCC voted today to relax the cross-media ownership rule, allowing organizations to house both newspaper and broadcast media entities.

After inheriting a small Australian (his native home) newspaper in 1952, Mr. Murdoch has amassed quite an empire, even referred to as a mogul by competitors and peers alike. After dipping his toe in the print trade, he has aggressively leveraged his business acumen to form one of the largest media conglomerates in the world—even becoming a US citizen in 1980 to gain entrance to television and arguably the single largest information marketplace in the world at the time.

Despite running into legislative difficulties from a rider enacted by a famous Senator from Massachusetts that ended an exemption allowing Murdoch to simultaneously own a newspaper and TV station in the same state, Murdoch persevered—and his News Corp. empire exploded.

To see the real extent of the FCC’s change in policy, here is a list of publications under the News Corp. umbrella:

Australia

Major newspapers:

  • Leader Community Newspapers [3]
  • Cairns Post Group (42%)
  • Sportsman

United Kingdom:

...

United States of America:

Link: http://www.answers.com/topic/list-of-newspapers-owned-by-rupert-murdoch

If print wasn’t enough for you, take a gander at News Corps’ broadcast, periodical and other content holdings:

Film

Television

Cable

Magazines and Inserts

Link: http://www.answers.com/topic/list-of-assets-owned-by-news-corporation

I have no position on private ownership of media outlets, provided they are PRIVATE.

However, I would question the effectiveness of the FCC and invoke the words of a great President, whom once quipped that the scariest ten words in the English language are “Hi, I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”

Monday, December 03, 2007

More than Something Blew Up

When it comes to interest rates, the old adage says that “the Fed raises rates until something blows up.” In fairness to Bernanke and co., the FOMC have reduced interest rates (arguably too late) but true to the old adage, something blew up. In this case it wasn’t a company, it was an entire asset class and those companies involved with it, even peripherally.

The “Sub-prime Crisis” is not easy to explain or decipher. The bottom line is that banks and others (mortgage lenders) extended credit to borrowers (homeowners), allowing them to buy their “dream homes.” The problem is that these houses should have remained dreams for these people and never, ever become a reality. Since the banks knew these loans were high risk, they attempted to offset it by pooling these high-risk loans together into pools, thereby selling pieces of these pools as securities, most commonly known as CDO’s or CMO’s.

Because of the buoyancy of the housing market and the high level of interest in participating from financial institutions, these securities were traded, leveraged off of and even repackaged with similar debt to generate trading revenue.

The way it looks now is that this asset class is like a road: many miles long, but only a few inches deep.

Take into account that many homeowners have foreclosed, those whom haven’t face mortgage resets to higher rates in the near future and that many market participants (mortgage brokers, banks and divisions) have gone out of business—liquidity has disappeared and the market for these securities has essentially frozen.

Since the financial markets are global today, it facilitated the spread of this sub-prime contagion into other sectors, mainly the Asset Backed Commercial Paper market. It has also had the obvious consequence of banks adopting stricter lending policies in general, sending borrowing costs sky high, which in turn hurts capital investment and R&D.


Returning to the Federal Reserve, Chairman Bernanke has maintained a position of returning liquidity to the market though firmly renouncing any idea that the FOMC will bail out speculators. Mr. Bernanke has also distanced himself from the response of his predecessor to any liquidity crisis which entailed cutting rates until the problem is solved. Instead, this FOMC (while reducing rates) has indicated it will be more active in the machinations of the bond markets, specifically in REPO’s—allowing institutions that are strapped for liquidity to either visit the Fed’s discount window or pledge their troubled debt as collateral for loans to ease the credit squeeze.
So far, the market has not been thrilled since the last FOMC meeting when it was made public —while the Fed recognized the risks—that the last cut was not supported by all members and further cuts looks unlikely.


Anytime market participants take on the mindset of shooting first and asking questions later, the result usually wind up bringing a scenario that produces the “capitulation” selling that pundits preach will become the basis of a market bottom. Most times the shooting is patently absurd and unnecessary, but took place because policy makers opted to be reactive instead of proactive. One of the many criticisms leveled toward the new Fed head is that he is an academic, with little practical experience.

Since the emergency cut and the many REPO interventions, things have gone from bad to worse in the market. Many of the largest banks and brokers have been forced to take write-downs in the $billions and everyone still feels as though they are looking into an abyss. Until investors are able to get their arms around what the damage is—or unless they are confident that the risks are not overwhelming, money will simply remain on the sidelines.

Nobody wants to own the next Citigroup ($47 down to $31 in 19 days) or the next Countrywide Financial ($17 down to $9 in 17 days) and they are clearly worried these companies will be forced to undertake major layoffs, purchasing cuts and the like that will spread throughout the economy as others follow suit.

More things will “blow up” unless the fed expands the scope of their campaign beyond the REPO market and discount window. Companies like Northern Rock, Bond Insurers like Ambac, the Credit Rating Agencies like Fitch and others will have their financial health put into question unless borrowing costs ease and liquidity returns to the fixed income market.

I understand the Fed is preoccupied with the inflation stemming from high commodities prices but if the entire bond market seizes up and sends the economy tumbling—$95 oil will be an afterthought—regardless of how much China is buying.

Monday, November 19, 2007

The Stephen Hawking of Finance

Stephen Hawking is a genius, plain and simple. Any scientist, let alone a physicist whom attempts to explain both the beginning and end of time quantitatively—whilst including things like “sub-atomic particles all the way up to “black holes” along the ride has already made his mark in history. If there is a human being that can detail the history of the universe, it is Stephen Hawking.

The finance world has its superstars as well—Warren Buffett, Eddie Lampert, Mario Gabelli, Stephen Schwarzman, (I know I am leaving off quite a few and I mean no disprespect, but just to illustrate my point) etc.; and they are all due tons of credit. There is only one “man with a plan” however, and that man is John Thain.

An MIT Grad in Electrical Engineering followed by an MBA from Harvard set Mr. Thain up for a career on Wall Street that will be talked about for years to come. His first executive position was at Goldman Sachs as COO and President, only to leave for the NYSE in the aftermath of the Dick Grasso debacle.

A merger with Archipelago combined with the elimination of the “seats”—essentially renovating what was a sinking ship, John turned the NYSE into a public company (from a non-profit) with shareholders. In addition, he created the “Hybrid” trading system, allowing for both floor trading (Specialists), yet adding technology that would allow the NYSE to keep up with increasing volume. Finally, he pulled off one of the largest international exchange mergers with Euronext—as several similar mergers (on a smaller scale) have happened afterward (told you he was on to something).

Leaving the NYSE and taking the top spot at Merrill tells me a few things. First, the worst is over for MER. Any further write downs will be attributed to his predecessor (if there are any), so even if more debt needs to be dealt with, it’s not his problem. Second, when he does turn the company around, he will make an absolute killing. He made the money that was sitting around with the NYSE by being prudent and looking forward. The NYSE was at a low both financially and in terms of pride. The fact that Merrill allowed so many bad loans to sit on their books for as long as they have is not very dissimilar.

While I do not know the man personally, he comes off as simply a numbers guy. He will have no problem firing, laying off, etc. an entire division of hundreds of people if he believes Merrill will benefit. Many pundits have speculated the reason that CEO Larry Fink (Black Rock Hedge Fund) didn’t take the job was simply because he doesn’t have the heart to do what needs to be done, no matter how painful, to right the ship in Merrill’s case.

One can also nearly guarantee that Mr. Thain will bring along some of his old pals from Goldman which will essentially be a coup for Merrill. On another note which is amusing, one of the things that aided Stan O’Neal’s departure from MER was talking with Wachovia about a possible merger/acquisition/etc.—without receiving permission from the Merrill Board (no matter how innocent or exploratory it may have been). Since it has been a give that Stan is on his way out, Wachovia has pinched some of Merrill’s best producers on the brokerage side. Amusing nonetheless.





CLICK TO ENLARGE

Friday, November 09, 2007

Bernanke’s Monetary Flex-cuffs

Bernanke’s Monetary Flex-cuffs

Are they too tight?


Will the housing market have a knight in shining armor ride to its rescue?

If we use history as a guide, it would be more like 535 bureaucratic clowns, most in bad suits (a few with bow ties- though no economists) riding in environmentally unfriendly SUV’s to the rescue (not to mention those who are frequent no-shows, so more like 300 or so members of the House and Senate).

Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson has been active both behind the scenes (working as a liaison between the White House, Congress, the Fed, and Wall Street. He has also taken initiative working with Brokers to set up a “Super SIV” or Super Structured Investment Vehicle to help restore liquidity to the credit markets, specifically amongst Mortgage-Backed Securities and related entities like CMO’s and CDO’s. Funnily enough, even though this is a “private venture funded with private money, Paulson’s fingerprints are all over it.

Conversely, the FOMC’s (and Federal Reserve’s) hands are tied. Despite several strokes of innovation like boosting liquidity in the credit market via REPO’s, applying a little WD-40 to open the discount window for banks after hiring a cleaning crew to get rid of the cobwebs and also cutting the Fed Funds Rate by 75 basis points (which was preceded by an emergency cut of the discount rate (mirroring their ECB counterpart Jean-Claude Trichet’s move to lend to banks at 4%) to alleviate the crisis.

Sadly to say, Bernanke and the FOMC can do little more. The ramifications of easy money (characterized by lower rates in an economy growing at 4%+) have become visibly apparent and borderline dangerous.

The most obvious result has been the dollar slide, which has boosted commodities prices into an area sure to push inflation higher. $90/ barrel oil, $800 oz Gold and record prices at the pump have returned. The secondary and tertiary effects are not much better. Industrial goods requiring energy and commodities are seeing severe price augmentation along with the cost of transporting and storing these goods that is approaching a spike.

On the positive side, trade imbalances are shrinking as the weakening dollar has benefited exports, which represents a huge slice of GDP.

Thursday, November 01, 2007

Two and Done?

It has been a real whirlwind of economic and financial activity here on Wall Street over the course of the last few months.

As the housing market continued its slide, the paper, bonds and other instruments (CDO’s, CMO’s, PIPE’s, etc.) backing these assets not only followed suit, but plunged and in many cases became totally illiquid. Nobody knew quite how to value them (disturbing especially since many carried ratings of AA or AAA) and bids all but dried up. Combine this with the 125 plus mortgage lenders/brokers that have gone bankrupt since the beginning of the year and you have all the makings of the beginning of a crisis.

Then the problem popped up in Europe, as lenders responded immediately by pulling back from lending and calling in loans. As a result, banks tightened practices globally and the ABCP (Asset Backed Commercial Paper) market seized up in response.

Enter Chairman “Helicopter Ben” Bernanke whom made the (under-utilized and antiquated) discount window available to banks and cut the discount rate 50 bps in between meetings. The FOMC also began conducting operations in the REPO market, essentially allowing banks to use bad paper as collateral for money (in the thought that soon the market would begin functioning).

The Fed then followed up on that with a rate cut during their regularly scheduled meeting and made clear that the risks of the credit market to the economic health of the economy outweighed those of price stability.

From August 16th (viewed as the end of the world by some) to October 11th, the S&P 500 and Dow Jones all hit new all-time highs.

Just yesterday, The FOMC followed suit with a second regular meeting cut of the Fed Funds rate, but shifting their language to straddle neutral.

Why?

Since the Fed flooded the market with money, Oil has broken $90/ barrel. Grain, Wheat, Flour and other food commodities logged all time highs. The US Dollar basket managed to set a record low, since they began tracking it in 1974.

Essentially, if inflation was under control before (which most believe it was), the FOMC’s actions have risked exacerbating further price inflation.

I don’t know that the Fed’s approach is right; then again I am not an economist. It seems that oil is the price stability bugaboo, and the Fed’s actions while certainly have contributed, are not the driver. New U.S. proposed sanctions on Iran, Turkey invading Northern Iraq and the insatiable quest for resources in Asia are far more culpable in pushing energy higher.

In fact if you look at the last two EIA Oil Inventory reports, analysts were expecting builds in oil stocks. That is stupid. If you were Exxon, Chevron, BP or some other oil Giant—would you build supply at $93/barrel or would you sell it on the spot market for cash, mitigating the risk of future price action lower? It is a no-brainer.

Interest Rate Hawks will say that how can the Fed cut the FF Rate 75 bps when the labor markets are tight, job creation is firm and GDP remains buoyant (3%+ last two quarters)?

The answer is simple. The data they cite already happened. The FOMC and Federal Reserve need to be focused on the future, because as it stands today this trend is unlikely to continue. There is no evidence to suggest the housing market has stabilized and that banks like CITI, UBS and Bear (just to name a few) are through taking these monster write-downs on bad loans—ones not confined to the sub-prime sector.

Look to the future

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Federal Reserve Open Market Committee

Federal Reserve Open Market Committee

(FOMC) Releases "Minutes" from most recent meeting

Before you actually go through the headlines, this is my take on the data (if you are interested):

I read this as a positive development for both equities and the housing market (as the FOMC moves away from fighting inflation and toward maintaining liquid, orderly markets to ensure solid economic growth).

While Friday's strong employment report was not available at the time of their meeting-- the downward trend in job creation and the quality of the jobs being created leave a lot to be desired. Seasonal factors (Teachers returning from summer break to School and more conducive Weather toward construction) also likely contributed to the upward revisions from months prior.

The Fed has the complicated task of further shoring up the credit markets from additional volatility and prepare for the potential for additional debt-related crises (both the ABCP- Asset Backed Commercial Paper and Mortgage-Backed Securities markets are still on shaky footing), all the while labor markets remain extremely tight (4.7% unemployment) and food/ energy prices (mainly wheat and crude oil) continue to hover near record levels.

(In my opinion) The brightest spot of all is the Fed's confidence that inflation will remain in check, giving them the wiggle room they so desperately need to head off any potential shocks to the economy, allowing the free market's invisible hand to emerge and remind investors that there has been little damage to the strong economic underpinnings that has paved the way the for the 5 year Bull Market underway.

-C. Post

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here are the headlines as they appeared on the Newswire (The Full Story follows):

( DJ ) 10/09 02:00PM *DJ FOMC: 'All' Fed Members Agreed To 50BP Sep Rate Cut

( DJ ) 10/09 02:00PM *DJ FOMC: Rate Cut Won't Affect 'Realistic' Pricing Of Risk

( DJ ) 10/09 02:00PM *DJ FOMC: Future Fed Actions Depend On Economic Outlook

( DJ ) 10/09 02:00PM *DJ FOMC: Econ Outlook Uncertain, Risks To Downside

( DJ ) 10/09 02:00PM *DJ FOMC: Fed Staff Cut '08 GDP, Core PCE Forecasts

( DJ ) 10/09 02:00PM *DJ FOMC: Staff Sees Above-Trend GDP Growth In '09

( DJ ) 10/09 02:00PM *DJ FOMC: 'A Little More Confident' On Sustained Inflation Drop

( DJ ) 10/09 02:00PM *DJ FOMC: Housing Remained 'Exceptionally Weak'

( DJ ) 10/09 02:00PM *DJ FOMC: Further Employment Slowdown 'Likely'

( DJ ) 10/09 02:00PM *DJ FOMC: Officials Skeptical About Original Aug Payroll Drop

( DJ ) 10/09 02:00PM *DJ FOMC: Inflation Risk If Dollar Keeps Falling 'Significantly'

DJ ) 10/09 02:00PM *DJ FOMC Minutes: Confident Of Sustained Core Inflation Drop

Friday, October 05, 2007

Stock Update

Apologies for the absence from posting new stocks or editorials since the summer, we shall be returning slowly to regular postings in the new format.

Short Term Stock Focus: AMEX China Index (CZH-A)

The CZH seems to be flashing some warning signs to investors after it went parabolic once again, this time straight off the August lows. Since 2004, bull moves in China have been steeper and steeper, with the last time approaching vertical.

Moves in Hong Kong have been complimentary until earlier in the week when the Hang Seng had the single largest reversal in 9 years—opening up 700 pts higher than giving back all of the gains, closing down 700 for the day—a 1400 pt swing!

The Asian markets may have gotten a little ahead of themselves lately. Many pundits are speculating that the USA is no longer the driving force behind the global economy. The Dollar has dropped to record lows against the Euro, US Credit Markets literally seized up in late summer through Mid-September (liquidity has returned though it will take more time to revive Mortgage-Backed Securities and other debt instruments) and the combination of interest rate cuts and a weakening economy has sparked new stagflation fears.

On the face of it, the pundits have a point—the US is in fact facing record food and energy prices while growth does seem to have abated. Across the Pacific, thinks seem swimmingly well in China as they continue their binge on oil, metals and other commodities while growth keeps on racking up.

The press has done a good job of reporting on goods manufactured in China that end up on our shores contaminated, though I don’t think this is a major story as it seems to be almost totally corrected.

Here are some of the negative points being ignored lately:

  1. Since the Yuan is pegged to the dollar and China is a major holder of Treasury backed bonds, bills and notes—they will surely be extremely prone to any fundamental change in the macro economy. Since most commodities are priced in US Dollars, if the dollar continues to weaken they will too pay higher prices for crude oil, natural gas, coal, steel, cement, timber and everything else feeding the real estate/ construction boom in Asia.
  2. Little known report came out a few weeks ago stating that last quarter inflation in China was 9.5% was simultaneously reporting monetary growth of 28%. Whether or not these numbers are legit is debatable, however if they are anything it is underreported. 9.5% wouldn’t pass the Federal Reserve, ECB or UK Exchequer’s inflation sniff test.
  3. It is a command economy. Sounds rudimentary, but it’s true. Very difficult to tell what an actual cross-section of the economy looks like as the government is constantly tampering on both the supply and demand sides.
  4. Chinese Banking system is quite far from transparent. In addition they have not faced any real tests as far as crises go and not knowing what reserves look like at some of their largest banks is reason for concern.
  5. Chinese Stock Market is an entity that is both unpredictable and unrelenting. Government attempts to rein in speculation via margin rates, stamp taxes and just today banning simultaneous listings of IPO’s is a balancing act. On the one hand there is tremendous growth presently driving the market higher, on the other is some bubble-like evidence emerging. Between investors using numerology to pick stocks and multiple expansion approaching NASDAQ 2000 levels, Alan Greenspan doesn’t miss the chance much to discuss the “Bubble” forming abroad in the 7 speeches he gives a week.

While I am not inferring the China bull is dead or that it is in fact a bubble, one cannot ignore the increasing number of warning signs flashing to investors. I do believe the lion’s share of gains for the short term have been seen and the intermediate term does look tricky, especially as the government seems determined to keep the market from getting out of hand. I believe the recent IPO move discussed in number 5 is a good example of how they are attempting to control supply from coming to the market as these listings have prompted many to expect PE’s to jump on these companies from 25x to 50x earnings.

I also don’t readily accept the theory that we are no longer the engine of global growth. The US economy has enjoyed an exceptional stretch of growth since 2001-2002 and short term contractions are quite normal. In addition, US borne innovation, increases in productivity and supply chain management have largely made the China bull possible, not to mention the fact they continue to heavily consume our goods and machinery.








CLICK TO ENLARGE